The project seems to be complex. When a project (or organization) is multifaceted and is active in different areas, environmental factors can push it toward different evolution paths so it evolves in certain areas. The best offer for such systems is to give them time to adapt structurally and ideologically to the new environment. China is the best example of economic adaptation, away from communism. Poverty was the driving force in China. In other countries, besides the economy, social and ideological issues may be the driving force too. The pressure keeps adding up. The best offer in this situation is to give it time to adapt.
UPDATE 1:
In situations such as this, the main talk is about intermediary steps. Starting the conversation with the final picture is normally a waste of time for both sides. Different parties should agree on intermediary steps.
It was said before that some intermediary steps can be beneficial for all sides involved in a conflict.
UPDATE 2:
When colours are very close, it’s hard for an outsider to detect any distinction between those colours and choose one among them.
Customers normally choose a process. Isolated incidents may be neglected by the public unless there is a clear roadmap so people know this is the first step toward a goal. Timing pressure is too high to establish such a roadmap.
UPDATE 3:
All people make mistakes. Some people claim to regret it, some prove their regret by their actions.