I’ve been working on the next section for a while, but it has evolved in different directions and is now confusing. Mainly because so far it included numbers but in this section it shifts to moving objects and SR.
I’ll probably post the next section today (although it’s incomplete). Then I’ll write the infinity article again based on the OOP structure.
Then the next step is to combine it with FS because when moving objects are involved, FS should also be included. However, this is not the final version; there will probably be another revision for the structure. Last year there were 3 revisions, and I don’t think this is going to be the last one. This is how OOP works it changes over and over, there is no final revision, but each revision is more precise than the previous one.
So I’ll change my daily plan a bit (which has been very irregular lately due to unexpected daily occurring). Early in the morning is for writing math stuff, then reading about physics/math. and afternoons will be spent on politics/platforms.
UPDATE 1:
OOP uses a tree structure. It means each revision can evolve in different directions. Each branch then will have specific properties. It’s not possible to include all properties in one branch.
UPDATE 2:
This is the new section:
https://1drv.ms/b/c/18094234b935aa79/ETTj9l3hRY9NrPpilHSP_CcBYJWXyf6W8SvXCygCFPK4Bw?e=u2rrtJ
The next section will be posted in the next few days.
These writings are very descriptive, in the main article they will be developed based on OOP methods.