It’s important how different sides respond to conflicts. When a preventive response is based on disrupting the world’s normal flow, with the effect of damaging the economy of some Western countries (which inevitably means indirectly helping Russia), the preventive response may imply new meanings besides protecting the intended side.
Now it is possible to say with confidence that Houthi attacks have done nothing to decrease the suffering of Palestinians. In contrast, in the situation where global pressure is mounting on the Israeli government, Houthi attacks are a precious gift to Netanyahu. When the Houthis’ plan has been proven to be very ineffective in stopping the conflict, on the other hand increasing diplomatic global pressure on Netanyahu has proved to be the most effective mechanism to stop him, resuming the attacks will disrupt the global effort to increase pressure on the Israeli government. Because it is totally in contrast to what the global community wants to achieve. The global community wants to stop disruptions and insecurity in the region, at the same time, Houthis are disrupting the world’s economy to support the cause.
Those disruptions might be repeated on other occasions, threatening the global economy. Destructive protests have many unintended side effects. Instead, it’s best to be reasonable and build something beneficial for the world.