When the cost of war is unaffordable for both sides, there will be only one solution. However, it’s important to note that even if there is no war, Iran’s currency will continue to degrade. People’s welfare will continue to deteriorate and social anger will keep building up. These are also ongoing costs Iran cannot ignore. Iran has no other option but to totally change because the cost is unaffordable.
Sidenote:
I said it yesterday and think it’s better to write it publicly here. Before the recent incident, I had an uncertain plan to go to Dubai and develop the platform there. However, if the conflict persists, I will stay. I’ll go only when the threat is gone.
UPDATE 1:
In military battles, each side evaluates the strengths and capabilities of the other side. The same should be done before military forces decide to start a battle with economic structures and entities. The basis of military actions is to dagame the capabilities of the other camp. But in boycott-equipped systems, military actions will have the reverse effect. That’s the same as one dropping a bomb on their own camp (i.e. the pro-war camp). In this situation, the two sides are fighting together. The pro-war camp is damaging itself, while the other camp builds structures to undermine the pro-war camp,