Khamenei threatens that if science is not enslaved by Fegh’h, he will set the entire region on fire. My response is this: for the good of the next generations I will have to reject that.
Burnt lands will revive if the mechanism is in place. I’ve learned that from nature, winters come and pass. Now this is the choice Khamenei should make: Is he willing to burn the region and beyond that in a failed attempt to enslave science? If so he has cut the root of Fegh’h forever. He will not only be remembered as someone who burned countries but also the man who finished Fegh’h. If this war starts Fegh’h has to win or it will be the end of it.
UPDATE 1:
This is not a war between believers and non-believers. Claiming science rejects the possibility of the existence of God is unscientific. Science is incomplete and does not provide an answer to that question.
So Khamenei shouldn’t consider himself in the position of defending God. He is in the position of fighting against what God has written in nature. There is no dispute among believers that nature is written by God.
UPDATE 2:
Scientific codes contained in nature that are revealed by scientists can be used in good or bad ways. As an example artificial intelligence. Who says what good or bad is?
Collective intelligence doesn’t lean toward any ideology. It provides mechanisms to harness the power of collective intelligence. So it provides a debate platform for example without specifying the outcome. The thing is when this platform is constructed inspired by natural processes, it will structurally block baseless arguments, fake stories and all sorts of contradictive discussions. So in such an environment viewpoints will clash with each other and some win based on evolutionary mechanisms and some lose. To win, people need to learn how natural processes work. So the development of collective intelligence should be neutral so that the best arguments win via evolutionary mechanisms. By artificially adding elements to favour one viewpoint over the others (and disrupt the evolutionary mechanisms), one stops the development of that evolutionary mechanism. This mechanism will be refined over time so it is not expected that it produces the best outcome at first. But to refine that it should be allowed to be evolved.
Collective intelligence favours solutions that are best for the system as a whole and not individuals. To discover what is best for the system as a whole, the info contained in the entire system should be accumulated. The mechanism to gather that info from different elements of a complex system and accumulate that is the subject of collective intelligence, and that should be developed based on processes that are contained in nature.