Political violence is hugely rejected. This causes enormous instability. Viewpoints that cause polarization such as the ones expressed by Trump should be stopped from the bottom up meaning that there should be better more effective right-wing policies so that people choose them over those types of Trump’s policies. This platform can achieve that if Trump wins or loses the election. Political violence will only cause huge instability.
(it is said that this assassination was done by someone deeply concentrated on the Ukraine war).
UPDATE 1:
(I write the day’s social topics in one blog post. Different updates are not always linked.)
The other issue (which is not connected to the previous topic) is about Iran. Iran’s regime thinks by dividing the opposition, its problems will be solved. Even if the opposition can be divided (however, as mentioned before this method is ineffective in collective intelligence), how does Iran want to solve its economic and social problems? Opposition is necessary for a smooth transition. Noting the rate at which the public diverges from the regime, the only other possible option is total collapse.
The impossible task of destroying the cohesion of the opposition distracts the regime from the main battle: constructing parallel paths to sideline the regime in some areas to start with. When those paths are constructed, the opposition will be united to use them. By construction, parallelism will provide a clear boundary on who is opposition, and who is not. The regime currently tries to blur this.
I had to write about these two topics on the same day because they are in response to incidents that occurred on the same day. They are not linked.
UPDATE 2:
The other issue is that I got messages that tried to discourage me from replying to happenings. I should say that sometimes ignoring incidents can be interpreted in certain ways so I have to write about them. That’s why I sometimes write about unconnected things on the same day (however, when the same message is being sent again and again and I’ve already responded to that, I ignore it).
UPDATE 3:
Just realized it’s unity week in Iran and people have issued statements. Unity cannot be achieved by words but by actions.
Every day I encounter many plots where Iran pretends different things (or pretends I said different things), however, whoever they say they want to make a foundational change toward a smooth transition phase, my response is that saying is not the same as doing.
Parallelism will do what it has to do. Parallelism and governmental issues are independent things. Parallelism develops parallel pathways, independently government can make structural changes. You shouldn’t even tell me about that because I won’t be involved. Do the structural change by passing laws, etc. if you’re serious about it.
UPDATE 4:
Khamenei talked about plots to divide Shia and Sunni Muslims. His record about treating religious and cultural minorities shows he didn’t need to fall into any trap. He has actively divided different groups.
The unity of Shia, Sunni and Judaism in the region cannot be achieved with this viewpoint.