Based on the uncertainty principle, p and q as one point in the phase space cannot be observed. This is comparable to different objects being viewed at the same spot when seen from a specific viewpoint. Those objects cannot be observed from that viewpoint. With a change of perspective, they can be viewed as distinct objects.
When a square is viewed from different perspectives the connections between different elements of the square will be changed. So hypothetically if it’s possible to change the viewpoint so that the relations between different elements in the universe change, that point in the phase space can be viewed. For example, a photon observer is undefined in SR because the spacetime shrinks to a point at v=c. But if that point is expanded into a space, a new space can be constructed that coexists with the viewpoint expressed by SR. These two viewpoints are at inf of each other and so they are independent. However, in the same way, the point at inf and z=1 construct a coherent structure in the projective geometry, these two independent viewpoints form a coherent entity. That’s as if two versions of reality are superimposed while both of them are not accessible at the same time. The other example is gravity. Gravity in the micro-state and macro-state might be completely different, again similar to the connection between the ep zone and the finite zone, these two types of gravity (which are independent) form a coherent entity.
This can be expanded to social context. People cannot view the same incident in the same way. The task is to provide mechanisms where the change of perspective is possible while the coherence of that is not broken, similarly to the example of viewing the square. OOP structures aim to do that. While there are different and independent versions of reality simultaneously, there should be mechanisms that enable changing the viewpoint while the symmetry of the structure is retained. The change of viewpoint is the process of changing the elements and connections between them.
The other example is evolution. I wrote in my daily notes some days ago that if the motion of species in nature can be expressed by something similar to the motion of objects a type of SR can be used there as well. In fact, the motion of species should be expressed by curves but the theory can start by SR. It means assuming that all elements move at the same rate and there is no interaction between them at all so no force is applied to any element to change its motion. From the viewpoint of an element, it is stationary, while other elements view that the element is moving away from their interaction zones. There is no real motion in this space because there is no interaction between different elements. The key is the existence of interactions so that symmetry can be produced. In such a system, elements are not meant to eliminate one another and then the winning element becomes the champion of the game, instead, the game is all about forming and evolving the symmetry, that is being able to view in different ways simultaneously while the coherence of the system is retained.
UPDATE 1:
As a sidenote, the root solution for Israel/Palestine is now more important than ever before (the root solution is a type of 2-state solution). It incorporates close connections between different religions, viewpoints and cultures.