Symmetry of a system tries to change it in such a way as to adapt to the new situation without being totally destroyed. If the system faces many challenges, clearly the worst approach will be to oppose them all and try to keep the curve unchanged. However, an enormous shock to the curve may cause the system to collapse altogether. So the best approach is to modify the symmetry mechanism so that the system gradually adapts to the new situation and produces new curves.
When all elements exist to ensure the curve will roll back to its previous measurement, it’s not advisable to push for a radical change all at once.
When tension is high between two individuals, it’s best to avoid each other as much as possible. The same applies when the tension between a government and its people is high. With high inflation and tax rates and heavy social presence the hypothetical government is in constant contact with its people.
One of the main areas of tension between Iran’s government and its people is Iran’s regional policies. If that changes in such a way that Iranians are included in international interactions, they don’t spend so much money for abroad military purposes and instead, they earn money, then that is something Iranians will consider as an achievement. This is good for the Iran government because it is protecting Palestinians, and simultaneously it decreases the tension between the government and its people.
Of course, for long-term survival, the symmetry mechanism should be updated. This is not a trick to silent Iranians, this is the first step toward adapting to new situations.