This is a good video about the history of the conflict:
When a person watches videos like this, they naturally ask themselves what possible solutions can be. The simple answer is there is no solution in the current environment. When the situation is so complicated and many historical issues are involved and problems accumulate, there can be no sudden correct solution. Instead, people should work on changing the battlefield and introducing new elements to the play so the conflict evolves in a new direction. Currently, power and military capability is the sole evolution factor. The aim should be to change it. not to come up with a perfect solution but, in the first step, to introduce new elements to the conflict. The region was once the symbol of religious tolerance, now it’s the symbol of religious conflict. This region should be a lab to develop techniques for racial/religious tolerance. Whether Israel has been treating Palestine as a lab for decades is something historians in the future should address, but there should be no secrecy about the intentions of those who treat the Israel/Palestine conflict as a lab to develop tolerance among different groups.
In such complicated situations, if one person tries to come up with a solution, it’s easy to jeopardise the entire project by assassinating that person or by carrying out plots to destroy his/her reputation. But when the strategy is to change the evolution path so that new workable solutions appear in the future, there is no one person to omit. So far all solutions could be stopped by targeting individuals. That is the weakness of a strategy. Long-term plans shouldn’t depend on individuals.