In this post “observation” is the symbol of being aware of elements that affect a system. This is in response to the same term that has been repeatedly used symbolically by Iranian politicians.
It seems Mohammed Ghobadloo, alongside Farhad Salimi, are about to be executed. His lawyer said the legal procedure had not been taken. So legal experts call the execution “a murder”. Numerous unjust trials have produced extraordinarily unjust sentences for 45 years in Iran. No one expects a system to be mistake-free, rather a system should be able to correct itself. Has Iran’s system corrected itself (for example when enormous economic corruption occurs)? That’s the question. In any factory, there are malfunctioning products. What have you done in 45 years to minimize that?
Self-correction is a vital property of any system. If you made a mistake (i.e. suppressing protesters the way you did) then you changed things to avoid future reoccurrence and refined it over and over, then you have erased your past mistakes. If you insist on it, you should expect it to reoccur again and again.
UPDATE 1:
Before any correction, one needs to be capable of observation. He/she should be able to see mistakes, rather than hide them. Only then they can work on how to fix it over time. If the same mistake keeps recurring, it means one thing: you are not capable of seeing. You are busy hiding mistakes. It would be far more beneficial if you looked at them in the eye and thought of ways to correct them. This is the definition of observation. It’s good to know the definition of what you think you possess, before being happy about having that.
UPDATE 2:
The math framework I’m working on is based on OOP. Other mathematicians may think of this method as arbitrary. I “randomly” build objects to see what I get. In the process, I’m looking for inconsistencies and trying to fix them, and then new inconsistencies appear, I then try to fix those mistakes and this is how the structure is developed. I actively look for mistakes. This is the foundation of this method. Mistakes are gifts. Correct them, and show some self-correction. Prove you are capable of observation.
UPDATE 3:
Mistakes are indicators to correct your path. Someone once said they knew someone who couldn’t feel pain on his tongue. He would bite his tongue without noticing it. His tongue had been severely injured. Pain is the indicator for correction. If it pains then avoid it. This is a critical indicator for path correction. Mistakes are indicators that the system you are running has deficiencies, if you hide it as if nothing has happened, your system will keep producing bigger and bigger mistakes. After decades you look back thinking, “Was I wrong all the time?” You’ve been told repeatedly by indicators, but you were unwilling to see.
UPDATE 4:
You hide mistakes to protect the reputation of your system. Compare yourself with those who build reputation systems and develop self-correction mechanisms to protect the system against future mistakes. Now be the judge. Which one protects their system better?
UPDATE 5:
If a protester harms your people, didn’t your people break the law by harming protesters to protect a wrong mentality?
دفعه بعد تو پیام نفرست. چشمهات رو باز کن و پیامهایی که سیستم به تو می فرسته رو ببین
UPDATE 6:
It’s hard to protect a leadership that is constructed on the basis of vision. North Korea’s leader is lucky. He can protect himself by military force only. In contrast, wisdom and vision are being challenged all the time. Newton never thought the system he presented would turn out to be only a small portion of reality.