Probably the same people who told Putin he could invade Ukraine within a few weeks, told him killing an opponent in Siberia is a cheap election tactic.
In politics, you shouldn’t necessarily look cool.
To protect Israelis the global community must try to stop the radicalization of Palestinians after the war. This involves finding the root causes (which is easy here, that is the current) and trying to stop it from being turned into violent activities. Israel’s government certainly cannot object to this effort because this is crucial for Israel’s security.
UPDATE 1:
The other issue is that Putin yesterday said it’s beneficial for Russia if Biden wins. It is actually known to everyone that upholding democratic processes is good for Russia. However, it is strange that Putin admits that. If Putin really wants to shift his attitude toward the democratic front, he should, in the first step, stop encountering his opponents.
In my opinion, this is a positive signal from Putin to the global democratic front.
UPDATE 2:
My plan for Fridays is very predictable. today I did Succession season 4, episodes 4 and 5. What a coincidence. And I should say I’m very scared.
Trump claims his objection to NATO is because some countries don’t pay enough. But his speech will inevitably be interpreted alongside the fact that some Republicans also object to US aid to Ukraine. On one hand, NATO is weakened (during its manoeuvre) and on the other hand aid to Ukraine might be blocked (which is the same as saying some Republicans are ok with Ukraine losing the war). These two decisions cannot be considered separately. They are two aspects of the same thing.
A few days ago was Iran’s 45th anniversary of the revolution. Iran is an example of a country whose military ambitions and ideologies have been the engine that specified its directions in all aspects including foreign politics, economics, etc.
Now it’s time for Israel to decide whether it wants to go the same path Iran started 45 years ago and let its military ambitions decide where the country goes, or whether it chooses to be integrated in the region. Integration cannot be achieved by force, and when Israel’s policy is at odds with the plan Middle Eastern countries, the West and the world at large pursue, gradual isolation is the only possible result. This is specifically true when the private sector leads the way.
The impact of this decision is so widespread that it requires serious consideration by Israeli politicians on different sides.
I came to the cafe again. I will wait a bit longer and then I’ll have to talk to the first person I see. It’s not known to me for how long the funny campaign will last so if no one comes today, I’ll start a discussion with someone random.
I wrote something some months ago that if oil companies increase their profit by polluting the air more, they will do it. There should be a natural brake to stop them. I suggested that there should be regulations to force them to make green investments in return for profit. Then they will be running against themselves. They earn profit now but by undermining their future selves.
This is comparable to some war tactics. Netanyahu now faces the most coherent world collision against Israel’s military ambitions it had ever seen in history. The more military operation makes the coalition more stable. This is an operation that undermines itself.
This is true that Israel is no stranger to outside hostility in history. Israel has been in a hostile environment in the Middle East. But it could overcome it because the world beyond the Middle East supported it. Or at least there was no global consensus to stop it. Netanyahu is the force that unifies the outside pressure. The more it pushes, the more the world pushes back by forming repelling structures. This is true because there are means to organize the outside pressure into a coherent unified force.
In such an environment, Netanyahu’s achievements will be very fragile to last. More attacks make things much worse for him.
I’m now in the cafe and will stay until noon. Don’t destroy your reliability. trying to be funny in this situation doesn’t make you look like you are in a strong position, it reaffirms you’re unreliable. Don’t send messages that destroy your reliability.
I’ll wait until noon (12:30, Tehran time), and then there is nothing I can do. I’ll go and wait for some more months.
UPDATE 1:
You specifically told me to come here this morning and now you are sending funny messages. It’s obvious that when you’re unreliable in your meetings you will be unreliable in your promises about the project. Whatever you’re trying to achieve, you’re destroying your reliability. I’ll say for two more hours and then I won’t come here anymore, because whatever you say might be a joke.
Be smart in how you present yourself as a strong side. You’re destroying your reliability.
UPDATE 2:
I waited until past 12:30 and no one came. Approached someone reading a book and she was unaware of everything and rejected me.
I think I cannot express myself. I don’t have to collaborate with you. I understand that you try to pretend you have the upper hand by making fun of me (here and in Dubai), but it now has a reverse effect.
The professional response to people who arrange a meeting but then send funny messages is to show them it would be to their advantage to avoid being labelled unreliable.
UPDATE 3:
I got all sorts of funny messages. They said the road was blocked, and to wait until the end of the day, and connect to the server (in the cafe I think).
I hope you got what you were trying to get. It would be astonishing if you expected to get a different result.
I’ve been trying to get an overall picture of the platform before starting the first version. I contacted two other phpBB developers. All I can do at this point is to contact available programmers. I can’t use freelancer platforms and this makes things very difficult. None of the programmers I contacted here replied so I’m a bit stuck.
If the UK’s government’s offer involves my personal life affairs I’ll respond to that offer in the court. It is far safer to start a negotiation online rather than to send someone to a cafe. I’m waiting for an online meeting to hear your offer. As I said I’ve my restricted conditions. I will not destroy the project. I rather wait for a few months.
UPDATE 1:
Tomorrow I’ll be open to negotiation. I’ll have no conditions besides ensuring the project will always be free, open and independent.
UPDATE 2:
I’m eager to make a deal but if the conservative party tries to test me again and tries to turn me into their pawn I’ll change my mode. I’ll be honest if you’re honest, at any point if I realise there is a trick I’ll be out, as simple as that.
To ensure the project will be independent I’ll get advice from other parties too.
The structure of each article is the same as a WordPress webpage. So I’ll contact WordPress and phpBB contributors (both are written in PHP).
Today I’ll contact the Telegraph and again the Guardian to explain the project. This is an open-source free decentralized platform, if collaboration with the government will totally transform the nature of the project I’ll work with the private sector, especially since near the election the primary goal for politicians is the election and not the efficiency of the platform. This has been proven to me again and again.
So I’ll contact both parties but I will have my conditions.
Decisions such as HS2 mean I should have very accurate conditions before collaborations. These types of quick decisions concern any collaborator. My conditions are limited to the project. Nothing personal will be included. I will post my conditions here later. Roughly I want to make sure the project will always be an open-source and decentralized platform where no one can make u-turns during party conferences and totally transform the project.
UPDATE 1:
I’ve sent many emails. This one won’t be any different. I should develop it myself first and then contact other people. So I won’t send emails at this point.
The project has started. At this point, this is a personal website because I’m developing it alone and I’m not linked with anyone. Better management styles would include group discussions which is not possible at this point.
The plan is to use open-source software that is supported by a large community and hire contributors to that project to extend the software.
UPDATE 1:
phpBB has an active community. There are many good extensions. This will speed up the development. phpBB is the best option I could find (I had to search online to see what other people say about different softwares), so the platform will be based on that. Then the wiki section should be developed.
