Ali's Journal

Today I’ll contact a Cambridge student. This is merely for friendship and is not about the project. I am sure the UK government will have no say in my private life and will not intervene with whom I start a friendship.

UPDATE 1:

I probably won’t get a reply. So since I won’t get a reply the next move is to send hundreds of emails to as many colleges as possible to as many professors as possible.

UPDATE 2:

This is my offer:

Immigration is a force that should be harnessed positively domestically and internationally. The domestic impact of immigration is clear but its potential international impact has been totally neglected. I’ll help conservatives in the immigration plan where asylum seekers and workers who want to migrate work on projects in poor and developing countries. This is good for developing countries, this is good for migrants. This is good for asylum seekers because it minimizes the uncertainty of the process. This is also good for the government in two ways. Firstly, asylum seekers are economically productive. workers acquire the necessary skills, which will be economically beneficial when they migrate to the country of their choice. Secondly, it’s a huge international positive force. This is the right policy at this critical time because the far-right is on the rise. This will be good news for Germany, for example, because it gives them an edge over the far-right. It’s the same for the US, France and other countries. Instead of controversial policies, Conservatives can present a plan that is backed by the public’s anxiety about the rise of the far-right worldwide.

In return, TheLab.cool should be run by the Green Party in collaboration with the Guardian (The Guardian is independent but leans more toward the centre and left, so it can present both Labour and LibDem).

After the election, conservative newspapers, such as The Telegraph, will join the project but only when the election is over.

I’m currently stuck in the dilemma of pretending to be in a desperate situation (while I’m not) and not doing that. I examined all aspects of it. Tried to identify all elements of the problem. And eventually decided not to pretend to be desperate when I’m not, and therefore not doing a particular party a huge favour.

Someone wrote a comment on one of my earliest posts (in this blog). It was in Russian, so I thought that was a message to me saying look you’ve wasted so much time and the platform hasn’t been started yet. But on the contrary, this wasn’t a waste of time, I have a much clearer picture of the project now and will keep making things clear in the coming months.

I remember my first attempts at politics and social activism back in 2016. My views at that time were very different from now. My ideas have evolved. My views now are the progression of those ideas. That’s why I wasn’t active in the 2016 election. It’s not about people. The thing is I’m ready now.

I spoke with a developer in India. He said it would take around 4 months and it’s way beyond my budget The only option for me is to draw the basic diagrams of how the project should look and then contact college professors and develop it in collaboration with different college departments.

It will include researchers in economics, politics and computer science at this point. So I should work on a presentation next week for a few days and contact college professors.

I sent emails to several developers in India and they haven’t replied yet but I don’t think, the offers will be very different. Four months is too long. If different colleges work on the project, the development phase will be part of the project so it’s not an issue if development takes 4 months.

UPDATE 1:

For some days I’ve been trying to send a message to number 10 about immigration. I find no words to express myself. 🌿🌲

Medical documents show that Ghobadloo had been treated for mental health in the past. That’s why the sentence was overturned.

In a hypothetical situation, if I, as a protester, saw a mad security officer killing innocent people and breaking the law as if there was a prize for killing and harming the opposite side, and there was no limit to the harm he could impose on opponents, would I do the same to that officer?

I didn’t get any reply from freelancers here, so I’ll contact Indian developers. I will keep it simple in the first step. It should be built step by step.

The project seems to be complex. When a project (or organization) is multifaceted and is active in different areas, environmental factors can push it toward different evolution paths so it evolves in certain areas. The best offer for such systems is to give them time to adapt structurally and ideologically to the new environment. China is the best example of economic adaptation, away from communism. Poverty was the driving force in China. In other countries, besides the economy, social and ideological issues may be the driving force too. The pressure keeps adding up. The best offer in this situation is to give it time to adapt.

UPDATE 1:

In situations such as this, the main talk is about intermediary steps. Starting the conversation with the final picture is normally a waste of time for both sides. Different parties should agree on intermediary steps.

It was said before that some intermediary steps can be beneficial for all sides involved in a conflict.

UPDATE 2:

When colours are very close, it’s hard for an outsider to detect any distinction between those colours and choose one among them.

Customers normally choose a process. Isolated incidents may be neglected by the public unless there is a clear roadmap so people know this is the first step toward a goal. Timing pressure is too high to establish such a roadmap.

UPDATE 3:

All people make mistakes. Some people claim to regret it, some prove their regret by their actions.