Yesterday I submitted the article to Computers and Mathematics with Application. I read that the editor works in Saudi Arabia. It is clear that acceptance and rejection of the article is based on the quality of the research. No matter what happens next, Saudi Arabia’s government will not be involved in any part of the process.
An article has recently been published in Nature that shows anti-matter is also pulled toward the mass in gravity. In FS, the direction of time is incorporated in SR and specifies whether the object recedes or approaches the origin. The same idea can be extended to gravity. It means the direction of time should be a basic input to the theory of gravity. When time moves forward, that is the default direction of time for matter and the anti-default direction of time for anti-matter. In the forward direction of time matter is gravitated toward massive objects. in the anti-default direction of time for anti-matter, it again gravitates toward the massive object because, in the default direction of time for anti-matter, space expands. To clarify if the direction of time is a basic input of the gravitational theory and if it is fixed for matter and anti-matter in an experiment, then both of them will behave similarly.
UPDATE 1:
However, the universe expands in the default direction of time for matter. This is still unclear but there might be two distinct types of inversions (similar to additive and multiplicative inversions in R). One inversion is based on CPT (and turns matter into anti-matter). In the other inversion, the direction of time is not changed. It turns gravity into anti-gravity. This inversion is not based on CPT and is a totally different type of inversion. The new inversion might have something to do with the inversion of the black hole. The origin is fixed under CPT (similar to zero in additive inverse), but the mult inverse turns zero into inf. The same appears to be true here. The origin (singularity) should be inverted to achieve anti-gravity.
UPDATE 2:
Anti-matter is the inverse of matter. They turn into pure E in annihilation. There should be two situations (in gravity/expansion) that are inverse of each other. For example, the Big Bang is the inverse of the Big Rip. Similarly, at any point in time, there is an inverse situation in the future. The combination of these two situations is always fixed. The identity element of this operation (i.e. the fixed value; for example, 1 in mult inverse) might be a breakthrough in the universe but is unclear at this point what it is.
UPDATE 3:
As a side note, 0*inf equals any real number. It means the mult inversion of zero/inf is fixed no matter which value is set to be the identity element. That is a type of relativity.
This is my first post in Dubai.
I won’t be surprised if I realize that some people try to sideline me. For example, they might start the project without me and in the middle of the project they give me a middle-level advisory role. This doesn’t concern me. Clearly, I will not be joining such a project if I suspect some people try to sideline me. This is not the project of one person, but political tricks should be distinguished from well-intentioned moves.
UPDATE 1:
The project will be initiated when I’m officially part of the project or I will not be involved at all.
I’m in the airport waiting for my flight to Dubai. It was a different experience for me. At first, I thought it would be similar to a backpacking type of trip but then it turned out to be a very different journey. I visited many different cities, big and small, tourist destinations and cities that are less known to tourists. Turkey is a very good country, in around 3 months I tried to get a big picture of it, but Turkey is much more than that.
I’m now getting ready to enter Dubai. I’ll probably stay in Dubai for some weeks (I can enter all cities in UAE but probably stay in Dubai most of the time). I expect the trip to be in some ways similar to the Turkey trip and in some ways completely different. I’ll continue working on the articles and the projects. Probably I should concentrate on contacting physics and math researchers, but again the plan is not predictable now.
There will be nothing secretive about the intention of the Green Party in this project. It aims to fix the reputation system and will say it clearly to the public.
Some people might think the Green Party should merely intervene in things directly linked to the environment. This is not true, environment preservation and green policies are products of a set of strategies and policies on which green policies are built.
Global climate funding is an emergency. There are different strategies to achieve that. One strategy can be this: A long-term roadmap is developed which outlines the infrastructure for a decentralized economic and social system which incorporates different aspects. Then to join this program countries should abide by some guidelines, pay certain fees, etc. This is like developing a new operating system and customers should pay something similar to the subscription fee. This project is the first step toward that operating system. Countries are reluctant to pay for climate issues. But now countries are investing in a new product.
Sent an email to the Green Party and discussed the social ad platform.
Also, I was travelling by bus yesterday and had some hours to think about the other project. I had heard that Kim Jong Un had passed a law forbidding wearing jeans. It’s clear that this idea came to him instantly he didn’t spend time to check if it was aligned with previous laws. That is similar to a mathematician who sets an axiom spontaneously without considering the rest of the structure. In contrast, math theorems are deductions from past expressions (theorems). Laws are somehow similar. Laws should be in accordance with the Constitution. Lawmakers cannot come up with ideas spontaneously. In the Un’s example, that law would contrast the freedom of choice (if this is included in the Constitution). The current method is that lawmakers write legislation but then judges decide if it contradicts the law or not. The better approach would be that laws are built using available building blocks (which are similar to the Constitution and previous laws). So a politician cannot come up with a law that defies everything, because not all ideas for new legislation can be built by available blocks.
UPDATE 1:
The Green Party will be merely a coordinator in this project. It is open-source and decentralized so earnings will be distributed among a large number of small-scale companies and start-ups. So the project is developed by the private sector. If the Green Party is banned from being directly involved, the project will still be developed. However, before starting the project, it takes some time for the party to draw the outlines of the project. Working on a theoretical program is not against the law and Green should start working on it soon.
It seems I’ll be travelling for some months so I should do something to earn money because I’ll have money for around the end of November. I was thinking about freelancing jobs but then thought it’s better to do something that is connected to the project but involves the private sector, so there will be no visa concerns or any government involvement.
A social advertisement start-up based on AI can be a good starting point. I’ll be working on a brief presentation and then contacting entrepreneurs and investors.
UPDATE 1:
It’s a good idea to contact The Green Party and develop a social advertisement mechanism in collaboration with the party. So it won’t involve the private sector at this point and can be developed in a decentralised way. I can travel around the world for a year or two to see what happens.
UPDATE 2:
The debate game incorporates social ads (that’s why it’s a game, players win money). So these are not different projects. They should be developed at the same time. However, since the debate project is apparently blocked, the social ads section will be developed first.
Laws and arguments incorporating those laws should be based on the same building blocks. It means rules should be built based on some elementary blocks and legal expressions should also be constructed by the same blocks. As mentioned before there should be a universal format for arguments. So they are not free-format speeches but they have a certain structure. Laws should be formed based on the same structure. This way, legal expressions are expansions of current laws by incorporating those building blocks.
In a chess game, players try to influence the strategy of the other side and at the same time construct their own strategy. Collective intelligence resembles multi-player chess, where several players play the same game (instead of black and white pawns, there are many colours each corresponding to a different player). So each player tries to influence the strategy of the other sides. This happens in online discussions where there are many players with different strategies and each player decides the best strategy to evolve their point of view.
I realized late that this journey was all about therapy. But on this path, I don’t need help from any person. I’ve been in difficult situations to gain necessary skills, it takes time and effort but I’ll do it alone. I’m now going to a more suitable environment. Then after that in Dubai, I intend to stay a bit longer so I can build connections with people there.
UPDATE 1:
For years, I thought the same way my work style gradually became more and more isolated, I could reverse it gradually when projects were being developed. But sometimes shocks teach people where they actually are. Unable to do simple things, they realize years of neglecting simple things have accumulated into a huge pile. They realize how far they have moved, but they didn’t notice it as it has been a gradual inclination of the path.
I should apply to study at Cambridge when the foundation of the math structure is complete. I’m now working on Article 2, which should be changed a lot. Submission 1 (posted some days ago) is based on a totally different structure and will affect all previous articles. Then SR should be developed. Only then can I study physics and try to incorporate things such as Neutrino. What I’m doing now should be done prior to my study at Cambridge. Of course, I will have unofficial connections to researchers there and attend some classes if I am there but officially applying to study there should be postponed for some months.
UPDATE 1:
I will submit the article in a few days, and wait to see what to do next. I’ve tried contacting researchers at Cambridge in the past. If I want to apply, I should clearly contact professors and researchers there first.
